ESG Investment Process Integration

U.S. ESG Regulatory Update: Q3 2023

Brian Helmes, William Wu

While European asset managers have been issuing periodic and entity-level reporting under the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation and the UK’s TCFD-Aligned Disclosure reporting , U.S. asset managers have had to navigate a fast-changing sentiment towards ESG investing. U.S. legislation is showing increasing divergence on core principles, and the debate about the validity of ESG investing has been amplified by politicians and constituents across the country.


Despite the politicization and anti-ESG rhetoric in the U.S., ESG continues to be a priority for asset management firms with a global client base.  Current legal challenges seeking to clarify how fiduciaries may consider ESG are unlikely to result in outright bans on ESG considerations.  Furthermore, many asset owners have already begun taking the necessary steps to compile emissions data required by the SEC Climate Disclosure rules. Pension funds such as the New York City Employees’ Retirement System and the Teachers’ Retirement System of the City of New York have already set emission reduction targets encompassing Scope 3 emissions. The California Public Employees’ Retirement System completed tracking Scopes 1 and 2 emissions in its Real Estate portfolio in late 2022 and are in the process of capturing Scope 3 emissions.


Further state level reporting continues to drive increased transparency on climate risk reporting. The California Climate Accountability Package, if passed, will mandate public and private companies that operate in California, (whose total revenues exceed $1 billion), to disclose Scopes 1, 2 and 3 emissions starting 2026. Companies whose total revenues exceed $500 million will need to publish climate risk reports starting 2024. Similarly, the New York Climate Corporate Accountability Act, if passed, will require all companies that operate in New York whose total revenues exceed $1 billion to disclose Scopes 1, 2 and 3 emissions.


Accordingly, investment firms continue to invest in ESG/sustainability capabilities to tackle the data and reporting challenges associated with integrating new data sets, and retirement plan fiduciaries continue to consider ESG focused funds within their portfolios.


U.S. asset managers seeking to meet with growing levels of disclosure requirements are looking globally to lessons learned from asset managers that have been preparing for sustainability related disclosure in Europe. Firms subject to meeting the requirements of Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and/or Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosure (TCFD) in the UK and Singapore are building valuable insights into scale and complexity challenges associated with entity and product level reporting. Sustainability risks, including mounting fears over greenwashing accusations is also driving a review of asset managers’ approach to enterprise risk management. Having a robust approach to ESG data and technology continues to underpin adherence to all of the above.

Contact Us

Alpha’s global ESG and Responsible Investment practice has deep industry expertise and is supporting asset managers and asset owners navigate the operational complexities of ESG regulatory compliance.  For more information on how Alpha FMC can help your organization, please contact us here.

About the Authors

Brian Helmes
Senior Manager

Brian is a Boston-based Senior Manager in Alpha FMC North America with over 15 years of diverse experience in financial services and consulting built over numerous years in industry and subsequent consulting engagements at leading global asset managers and government institutions. Brian also leads ESG research and advisory efforts for North America.

William Wu

Will is a New York-based Analyst in Alpha FMC North America. Will supports ESG research and advisory efforts for Alpha NA, and has experience supporting investment managers within the Operations, Investments and Benchmarking practice areas. He is a graduate of Georgetown University where he obtained a BA in Political Economy with a thesis titled “A Cautious Step Forward: Carbon Emissions Trading in China.”